Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Brooke Buddemeyer Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
brooke-buddemeyer
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Brooke Buddemeyer

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Brooke Buddemeyer vs. Trevor Foley, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections

Appellant

Brooke Buddemeyer appealed the circuit court's decision to quash a preliminary writ of prohibition, arguing she was being held beyond the conditional release term for non-dangerous felonies as defined by Section 558.011.4(1)(b). She contended that her conditional release term should begin at the start of her twelve-year sentence, rather than after serving the prison term. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, holding that the plain language of Section 558.011, read in conjunction with other statutes and regulations, requires the prison term to be served before the conditional release term.