St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Business Loop Community Improvement District, Tom May and Carrie Gartner Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
business-loop-community-improvement-district-tom-may-and-carrie-gartner
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil LitigationCorporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Business Loop Community Improvement District, Tom May and Carrie Gartner

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Jennifer Henderson challenged a sales tax election conducted by the Business Loop Community Improvement District, alleging irregularities. The trial court dismissed her petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding no statutory authority for such a challenge. The appellate court reversed, holding that Henderson's claims were not moot, the trial court possessed subject matter jurisdiction, and Chapter 115 of Missouri's general election laws provided the statutory authority to contest the CID sales tax election.

Criminal LawCivil LitigationCorporate Law