Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BUTTERBALL, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
butterball-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Workers' Compensation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving BUTTERBALL, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Butterball, LLC appealed a workers' compensation award to the estate of Manuel Duarte, challenging the timeliness of the substitution of Duarte's personal representative and the sufficiency of evidence for the award. Duarte died during the review process, and Butterball argued the claim should be dismissed due to untimely substitution under Rule 52.13. The appellate court affirmed the award, holding that Rule 52.13 does not apply to workers' compensation cases, and the statutory requirements for substitution under section 287.580 were met. The court also found the employer waived objections to expert testimony regarding causation and disability by failing to object at trial, thus upholding the sufficiency of evidence.