Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

CANDACE HARRELL KYLE, CANDACE HARRELL KYLE, Personal Representative of the Estate of GEORGE L. HARRELL, Plaintiff- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
candace-harrell-kyle-candace-harrell-kyle-personal-representative-of-the-estate-of-george-l-harrell-plaintiff
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving CANDACE HARRELL KYLE, CANDACE HARRELL KYLE, Personal Representative of the Estate of GEORGE L. HARRELL, Plaintiff-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Candace Harrell Kyle sued Carolyn Fowler over a one-half interest in a 75.55-acre property, seeking cancellation of a deed, a constructive trust, and damages for breach of an oral contract. The trial court granted relief to Kyle on these claims. On appeal, the Southern District of Missouri vacated the trial court's judgment, holding that the claim for cancellation of the deed was time-barred by the 10-year statute of limitations and that the alleged oral contract for an interest in land was unenforceable under the statute of frauds. The case was remanded for further proceedings.