Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Carmen McHenry and Jacob McHenry Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
carmen-mchenry-and-jacob-mchenry
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Carmen McHenry and Jacob McHenry

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 8, 2019

Tom Burke vs. Carmen McHenry and Jacob McHenry

Respondent

Tom Burke appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court of Platte County that awarded Carmen and Jacob McHenry attorney's fees and lost rental income from a supersedeas bond Burke had posted. The supersedeas bond was related to an earlier quiet title action where the McHenrys prevailed. The appellate court reversed the award of attorney's fees, finding they were not recoverable from the bond as damages for delay or costs of appeal. However, the court affirmed the award of lost rental income, concluding it was supported by substantial evidence.