St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Carol Clift and Division of Employment Security Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
carol-clift-and-division-of-employment-security
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationEmployment Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Carol Clift and Division of Employment Security

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 26, 2021

Lex Group, Inc. vs. Carol Clift and Division of Employment Security

Respondent

Lex Group, Inc. appealed a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found Carol Clift eligible for unemployment benefits. The appellate court, however, dismissed the appeal due to Lex Group's failure to timely file its notice of appeal. The court determined it lacked jurisdiction because strict adherence to statutory time standards in employment security cases is mandatory, and Rule 81.07(a) does not apply to such appeals.

Civil LitigationEmployment Law