Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Casey Lowery Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
casey-lowery
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Casey Lowery

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 20, 2022

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Casey Lowery, Appellant.

Appellant

Casey Lowery was found guilty of second-degree murder, first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, Lowery challenged the sufficiency of the evidence for his murder and associated armed criminal action convictions, arguing issues with witness credibility and the circumstantial nature of the evidence. The Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, was sufficient for a rational fact-finder to find Lowery guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.