Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Chad Franklin, Chad Franklin National Auto Sales North, LLC and CFS Enterprises, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
chad-franklin-chad-franklin-national-auto-sales-north-llc-and-cfs-enterprises-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Chad Franklin, Chad Franklin National Auto Sales North, LLC and CFS Enterprises, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Glenna J. Overbey, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Max E. Overbey, sued Chad Franklin and his entities for fraudulent transfer after Tiffany Franklin, Chad Franklin's wife, received settlement proceeds from a bad faith lawsuit, allegedly to prevent Overbey from collecting a prior judgment. The trial court sanctioned the Franklin parties by striking their pleadings and entering an interlocutory judgment on liability. After a jury awarded $0 in damages, the trial court granted Overbey's motion for a new trial due to instructional error and closing argument misconduct. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's grant of a new trial, finding no abuse of discretion, as the trial court correctly identified its error in deviating from the mandatory MAI 31.07(A) instruction, which prejudiced Overbey.