Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Charles Orth, D.O., and Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
charles-orth-do-and-orthopedic-surgeons-inc
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Charles Orth, D.O., and Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Dane Templeton sued Dr. Charles Orth and Orthopedic Surgeons Inc. for medical malpractice, alleging negligence in treatment. The circuit court granted summary judgment for Dr. Orth, finding Templeton's action was time-barred by the two-year statute of limitations. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Templeton's actions of seeking an alternative treatment plan and discontinuing Dr. Orth's prescribed antibiotics without consultation terminated the physician-patient relationship, thus ending the continuing care tolling doctrine before the lawsuit was filed.