Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Cheri Nabil El-Halawany, M.D. and Lien Pham Russell, M.D. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
cheri-nabil-elhalawany-md-and-lien-pham-russell-md
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Cheri Nabil El-Halawany, M.D. and Lien Pham Russell, M.D.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Cheri Nabil El-Halawany, M.D. and Lien Pham Russell, M.D. vs. The Children's Mercy Hospital

Appellant

Drs. Cheri Nabil El-Halawany and Lien Pham Russell sued The Children's Mercy Hospital (CMH) for unlawful employment discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act, alleging discrimination based on race, national origin, and sex/gender after being involuntarily assigned to a different clinic. The trial court granted summary judgment for CMH, finding the doctors failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the doctors did not suffer an adverse employment action and that CMH complied with summary judgment electronic filing rules.