St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Cherise Brock and Anthony Brock Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
cherise-brock-and-anthony-brock
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Cherise Brock and Anthony Brock

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 21, 2024

Cherise Brock and Anthony Brock, Appellants, vs. Dr. Rishad Shaikh, Respondent.

Appellant

Cherise Brock sued Dr. Rishad Shaikh for negligence after sustaining a permanent lingual nerve injury following a wisdom tooth extraction. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Dr. Shaikh. On appeal, Brock argued the trial court erred by allowing Dr. Shaikh's expert to testify on redirect regarding a post-operative X-ray and by denying cross-examination of Dr. Shaikh with a previous patient's medical records. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no abuse of discretion on either point.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation