Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

CHRIS WOOD, Petitioner- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
chris-wood-petitioner
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving CHRIS WOOD, Petitioner-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 19, 2023

CHRIS WOOD, Petitioner-Respondent v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant

Respondent

The Director for the Missouri Department of Revenue appealed a judgment reinstating Chris Wood's driver's license after he refused a chemical test following an arrest by a federal park ranger. The trial court found the federal ranger lacked authority under Missouri's Implied Consent law. The appellate court vacated the judgment, holding that federal park rangers are "arresting officers" under Missouri's Implied Consent law and that license revocation can proceed based on federal citations. The case was remanded for the trial court to make specific factual findings and enter a new judgment.