Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Chunjuan Shan Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
chunjuan-shan
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Chunjuan Shan

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Chunjuan Shan vs. Division of Employment Security

Appellant

Chunjuan Shan appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (LIRC) dismissal of her application for review of an unemployment benefits claim. The LIRC had dismissed her application as untimely, and Shan subsequently filed her notice of appeal to the appellate court over ten months after the LIRC's decision became final. The appellate court dismissed Shan's appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the untimely filing of a notice of appeal divests the court of authority to hear the appeal, regardless of the reasons for the delay.