Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

City of Cottleville, MO, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
city-of-cottleville-mo-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving City of Cottleville, MO, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 11, 2025

Harmony Pointe, LLC, Respondent, v. City of Cottleville, MO, et al., Appellants.

Appellant

Harmony Pointe, LLC, sought to construct a mixed-use project, receiving final plan and construction plan approval from the City of Cottleville. The City later issued a stop work order, claiming construction had not begun within one year, causing the final plan to expire under municipal code section 405.390(C). The City's Board of Adjustment upheld the order, but the trial court reversed, finding construction had begun. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, agreeing that the work performed by Harmony Pointe constituted "construction" under the municipal code, thus the final plan had not expired.