St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

City of Florissant, and Todd Hughes Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
city-of-florissant-and-todd-hughes
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil LitigationReal Estate

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving City of Florissant, and Todd Hughes

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

The St. Louis Association of Realtors challenged the City of Florissant's residential rental property licensure ordinance, alleging it was unconstitutionally vague, violated procedural due process, constituted an unlawful taking, and was preempted by state law. The trial court granted summary judgment to the City, finding the ordinance constitutional and not preempted. The Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, addressing each of the Appellant's four points on appeal.

Criminal LawReal EstateCivil Litigation