Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

City of Kearney, Missouri Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
city-of-kearney-missouri
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving City of Kearney, Missouri

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Mark and Sherry Davis, David and Denise Kamm, and Kevin Laughlin sued the City of Kearney for inverse condemnation, alleging soil erosion in their backyards due to the City's stormwater drainage system. The circuit court granted a directed verdict against Laughlin, finding no notice to the City of erosion on his property, but a jury found for the Davises and Kamms. On appeal, the Western District affirmed, holding that Laughlin failed to prove notice, and that the Davises and Kamms properly sought damages for a partial taking, not a total taking, which was supported by the evidence. The court also affirmed its appellate jurisdiction, rejecting arguments regarding judgment finality and timely appeal.

Respondent

Mark and Sherry Davis, David and Denise Kamm, and Kevin Laughlin filed an inverse condemnation action against the City of Kearney due to increased stormwater flow causing erosion. The trial court granted a directed verdict for Laughlin and jury verdicts for the Davises and Kamms, but did not determine prejudgment interest or the date of taking. On cross-appeals, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, dismissed the appeals for lack of a final judgment. The court held that a judgment reserving the calculation of prejudgment interest and the date of taking is not final and appealable, thus depriving the appellate court of jurisdiction.