Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

City of Ladue, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
city-of-ladue-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving City of Ladue, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 11, 2025

David P. Oetting, Appellant, v. City of Ladue, et al., Respondents.

Respondent

David Oetting appealed the issuance of building permits by the City of Ladue to neighboring property owners, alleging the lot failed to meet frontage requirements. Ladue's Zoning Board of Adjustment dismissed Oetting's appeal as untimely, a decision subsequently affirmed by the circuit court. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, holding that Oetting failed to file a timely appeal to the Board because he had notice of the permit's issuance well in advance of his appeal.