St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Clyde O. Carter, Sr. and Linda Darnell Bowie Carter Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
clyde-o-carter-sr-and-linda-darnell-bowie-carter
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Real Estate ConsultationCall About A Real Estate Claim

Cases Involving Clyde O. Carter, Sr. and Linda Darnell Bowie Carter

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Clyde O. Carter, Sr. and Linda Darnell Bowie Carter vs. Clyde O. Carter, Jr.

Appellant

Clyde O. Carter, Sr. and his wife, Linda Darnell Bowie Carter, appealed a trial court judgment that upheld a quitclaim deed transferring a residence from Carter Sr. to his son, Clyde O. Carter, Jr. The Carters had sought to set aside the deed, arguing Carter Sr. lacked mental capacity and could not solely transfer the property. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, finding significant briefing and analytical deficiencies and a failure to file a record that complied with appellate rules.

Real EstateCivil Litigation