Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

CODY RANDALL MCKENZIE Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
cody-randall-mckenzie
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving CODY RANDALL MCKENZIE

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Feb 25, 2020

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. CODY RANDALL MCKENZIE, Appellant

Appellant

Cody Randall McKenzie appealed his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action, arguing that the evidence was insufficient and that the trial court erred in denying his peremptory strikes of two male jurors. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding that McKenzie failed to challenge specific elements of the crimes and that the jury disbelieved his defense claims. The court also concluded that the trial court did not clearly err in finding McKenzie's gender-neutral reasons for the peremptory strikes were pretextual.