Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Colleen O'Donnell Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
colleen-odonnell
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Corporate LawSlip and FallCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Corporate ConsultationCall About A Corporate Claim

Cases Involving Colleen O'Donnell

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Colleen O'Donnell sued River City Casino & Hotel and Total Lot Maintenance (TLM) for personal injuries sustained from a slip and fall on ice at the casino during a winter storm. The trial court granted summary judgment for both defendants. The appellate court affirmed summary judgment for River City, applying the Massachusetts Rule that landowners owe no duty for natural ice accumulation. However, the court reversed and remanded summary judgment for TLM, finding a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether TLM's contractual duty to remove or treat ice had been triggered.

Corporate LawSlip and FallCivil Litigation