Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Collin M. Stosberg Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
collin-m-stosberg
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Collin M. Stosberg

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 9, 2021

Collin M. Stosberg vs. Electric Insurance Company

Appellant

Collin M. Stosberg, a Missouri State Highway Patrol sergeant, sought Uninsured Motorist (UM) benefits from Electric Insurance Company after being injured by an uninsured motorcyclist during a DUI checkpoint. The trial court granted summary judgment for Electric on three independent grounds: the injuries did not arise out of the use of the uninsured motor vehicle, a workers' compensation exclusion applied, and public policy precluded UM coverage. The appellate court reversed the summary judgment, finding that Stosberg's injuries did arise from the use of the motorcycle, the exclusion did not apply because Electric was not a "third person" for subrogation, and no public policy prevented UM coverage for law enforcement officers. The case was remanded for further proceedings.