St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Como Premium Construction LLC, D/B/A Como Premium Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
como-premium-construction-llc-d/b/a-como-premium
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Corporate LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Como Premium Construction LLC, D/B/A Como Premium

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 7, 2025

Como Premium Construction LLC, D/B/A Como Premium vs. Erin L. Pulster

Appellant

Erin Pulster appealed a trial court judgment finding her liable for breach of contract to CoMo Premium Construction LLC for deck remodeling services. Pulster argued the trial court lacked authority because the parties had an arbitration agreement. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that Pulster waived her right to arbitration by participating in the bench trial. The case was remanded for the trial court to determine post-judgment attorney's fees.

Corporate LawCivil Litigation