Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Corey Ellington Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
corey-ellington
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Corey Ellington

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 2, 2018

Corey Ellington, Respondent, vs. Napleton's Mid-Rivers Motors, et al., Appellants.

Respondent

Corey Ellington sued Napleton's Mid-Rivers Motors, et al., alleging a violation of Missouri's service letter statute. Defendants moved to compel arbitration, which the trial court denied as to the service letter claim, reasoning it arose after employment termination and was not specifically referenced in the arbitration agreement. The appellate court reversed, holding that the service letter claim fell within the broad scope of the arbitration agreement, which covered claims arising from employment or termination and explicitly survived termination. The case was remanded with directions to compel arbitration and stay proceedings.