Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Cory Wayne Craig Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
cory-wayne-craig
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Cory Wayne Craig

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 3, 2022

Lacy Anne Craig vs. Cory Wayne Craig

Respondent

Cory Craig (Husband) appealed from a dissolution judgment, raising six points concerning child support, appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL), and property division. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment. Most of Husband's points were denied due to failure to preserve them for review, specifically for non-compliance with Rule 84.04 briefing requirements or failure to plead an affirmative defense. The court found no merit in Husband's preserved claim regarding the non-appointment of a GAL, as child abuse was not expressly alleged in a pleading and no harm to the children was shown.