Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

CRAIG ALLEN RICE Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
craig-allen-rice
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving CRAIG ALLEN RICE

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Date unavailable

CRAIG ALLEN RICE, Respondent v. MADASYN SCARLETT, Appellant

Respondent

Mother appealed the circuit court's amended judgment of modification in a child custody case, arguing the trial court erred by refusing to disqualify the guardian ad litem (GAL). Mother contended the GAL failed to interview non-party family members and acquaintances she requested, as required by statute. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that a GAL has discretion in whom to interview and is not statutorily mandated to interview every person requested by a parent. The court concluded the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to disqualify the GAL.