Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Danny Harris Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
danny-harris
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Danny Harris

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 1, 2019

Danny Harris, Appellant, vs. Ralls County, Missouri, Respondent.

Appellant

Danny Harris appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision modifying an Administrative Law Judge's award for his work-related back injury. The Commission found Harris was not permanently totally disabled and suffered only five percent permanent partial disability, denying future medical benefits. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's findings that Harris was not permanently totally disabled and not entitled to future medical treatment. However, the court reversed and modified the Commission's determination of medical causation and the permanent partial disability rating, increasing it from five percent to twenty percent, finding it was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the Commission erred in disregarding precedent.