Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

David B. Karr, Individually and On Behalf of Others Similarly Situated Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-b-karr-individually-and-on-behalf-of-others-similarly-situated
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving David B. Karr, Individually and On Behalf of Others Similarly Situated

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

David B. Karr, individually and on behalf of a class, sued Kansas City Life Insurance Company (KCL) for breach of contract related to universal life insurance policies. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Karr on liability, awarded damages after a jury trial, and denied prejudgment interest. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's rulings on liability, statute of limitations, primary jurisdiction, damages, and class certification. However, the court reversed the denial of prejudgment interest, finding the damages were ascertainable, and remanded the case for calculation of that award.