Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

David Broy, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-broy-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving David Broy, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jul 30, 2024

David Broy, et al., Respondents, v. Diane Broy, Appellant.

Respondent

Diane Broy appealed a trial court judgment that found she breached her fiduciary duties as her mother's attorney-in-fact, engaged in self-dealing, and failed to maintain her mother's estate plan, awarding damages and imposing a constructive trust in favor of her siblings, David Broy and Lisa Lyon. The appellate court affirmed the findings of breach of fiduciary duty and the siblings' standing as "successors in interest" under Section 404.717. However, it reversed the imposition of the constructive trust, finding insufficient evidence to identify a specific res, and instead entered a money judgment for the siblings and remanded for a determination of appellate attorney's fees.