Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

David Cox, Platte County Assessor, and Park Hill School District Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-cox-platte-county-assessor-and-park-hill-school-district
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving David Cox, Platte County Assessor, and Park Hill School District

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Grady Hotel Investments, LLC, appealed the Platte County Circuit Court's judgment, which reversed a decision by the State Tax Commission (STC) regarding the taxable valuation of Grady's interest in a hotel at KCI. The STC had found Grady held only a leasehold interest, valued at zero, using the bonus value method. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, holding that the plain language of the contracts between Grady and the City of Kansas City demonstrated Grady owned the improvements, not merely a leasehold interest. Consequently, the bonus value method was deemed an inappropriate valuation approach, and the case was remanded to the STC for reconsideration.