Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

DAVID JAMES MILCENDEAU, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-james-milcendeau-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving DAVID JAMES MILCENDEAU, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jan 31, 2019

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DAVID JAMES MILCENDEAU, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

David Milcendeau was convicted of child molestation and statutory sodomy after a jury trial. On appeal, he raised two plain error points concerning venue, arguing the State failed to prove venue and that the prosecutor made an improper comment about venue during closing arguments. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that Milcendeau invited any venue error by failing to object before trial and waived the issue by requesting a change of venue. The court declined to exercise plain error review.