St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

David Kelly Burre, Trustee of the David Kelly Burre Revocable Trust Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-kelly-burre-trustee-of-the-david-kelly-burre-revocable-trust
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCivil LitigationCorporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving David Kelly Burre, Trustee of the David Kelly Burre Revocable Trust

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Teri Deffenbaugh and Kelly Forck sued David Kelly Burre, Trustee, for specific performance of a real estate purchase contract. The trial court denied specific performance, finding the property description indefinite and that Deffenbaugh failed to satisfy a condition precedent regarding access rights. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that Deffenbaugh did not perform his contractual obligation to obtain necessary access and could not unilaterally waive this condition. The court also granted Burre's request for appellate attorney's fees and remanded for their calculation.

Real EstateCorporate LawCivil Litigation