Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

David Thompson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-thompson
Cases Shown
3
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving David Thompson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 22, 2025

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. David Thompson, Appellant.

Appellant

David Thompson appealed his conviction for abandonment of a corpse, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court's denial of his request for grand jurors to attend trial. The appellate court dismissed the appeal because Thompson failed to provide a complete trial transcript, which is necessary for meaningful review of the issues raised. The court noted that the incomplete record prevented it from evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence or the merits of the grand juror attendance request.

Appellant

David Thompson appealed his conviction for fourth-degree domestic assault and violating an order of protection, which arose from an incident where he struck his ex-boyfriend with a vehicle. Thompson claimed the circuit court erred by denying his right to counsel at a preliminary hearing, rejecting his proposed lesser-included offense instruction, and submitting a corrective instruction after the jury returned inconsistent verdicts. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, concluding that all of Thompson's claims lacked merit.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 3, 2024

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Thompson, Appellant.

Appellant

David Thompson appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the fourth degree and violation of an order of protection. He argued the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for lack of counsel at his preliminary hearing, rejecting his proposed lesser-included jury instruction, and giving a curative instruction after inconsistent verdicts, which he claimed violated double jeopardy. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding no prejudice from the lack of counsel, no manifest injustice regarding the jury instruction, and no double jeopardy violation because the inconsistent verdicts were not accepted before the jury was discharged.