Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

David Vandergriff, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-vandergriff-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving David Vandergriff, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Aug 20, 2024

Gregory Hill-Bey, Appellant, vs. David Vandergriff, et al., Respondents.

Respondent

Gregory Hill-Bey, an incarcerated individual, appealed the circuit court's dismissal of his petition alleging Sunshine Law violations against the Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correction Center. The circuit court dismissed the petition because Hill-Bey failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required by Missouri's Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). The appellate court affirmed, holding that Hill-Bey did not plead or show exhaustion of administrative remedies for his specific Sunshine Law claim, and that the PLRA's exhaustion requirement applies to Sunshine Law claims, which are not constitutional claims.