Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dean Minor Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dean-minor
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dean Minor

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Travis Jonas sought a writ of habeas corpus after his probation was revoked, arguing the circuit court lacked authority because he had accrued sufficient earned compliance credits (ECCs) and paid restitution. The Missouri Supreme Court granted habeas relief, holding that section 217.703.8 does not bar challenges to ECC calculations in habeas corpus. The Court found that Jonas had accrued enough ECCs and paid restitution, triggering his discharge under section 217.703.7, which divested the circuit court of authority to revoke his probation. The Court further clarified that the division of probation and parole's failure to provide 60 days' notice does not delay final discharge.