Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Delaunte Bozeman Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
delaunte-bozeman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Delaunte Bozeman

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Aug 2, 2022

Delaunte Bozeman, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appellant

Delaunte Bozeman appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call an expert witness at sentencing to present mitigation evidence related to his juvenile status. The motion court denied relief, and the appellate court affirmed. The appellate court concluded that counsel's decision not to call an expert was a reasonable trial strategy, thus Movant failed to satisfy the performance prong of the Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel.