Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

D.E.P., JR Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dep-jr
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving D.E.P., JR

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

D.E.P. Jr., a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent for conduct that would constitute the class D felony of stealing, stemming from fraudulent refund transactions at a grocery store where he worked. He claimed he acted under duress due to threats from his manager. The juvenile division found sufficient evidence to prove the stealing offense and ordered commitment to the Division of Youth Services. On appeal, the Southern District affirmed, holding that the juvenile division did not err in its finding, as the appellate court would not reweigh conflicting evidence or make credibility determinations regarding the duress defense.