Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

D'ERECK WHITNEY, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dereck-whitney-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving D'ERECK WHITNEY, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Aug 22, 2024

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. D'ERECK WHITNEY, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Defendant D'Ereck Whitney appealed his convictions for murder, armed criminal action, assault, unlawful use of a weapon, and property damage. He argued the trial court erred by admitting a YouTube video and that there was insufficient evidence for his first-degree assault convictions. The appellate court affirmed the admission of the video, finding the defendant "opened the door" to its admission. However, the court reversed several first-degree assault convictions due to insufficient evidence of specific intent, remanding for entry of convictions for the lesser-included offense of fourth-degree assault.