Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Derek Maxwell Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
derek-maxwell
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Derek Maxwell

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 23, 2024

Derek Maxwell, Respondent, vs. Christina Maxwell, Appellant.

Respondent

Mother appealed the trial court's judgment granting Father sole legal and physical custody of their three minor children. Mother contended the trial court erred by failing to enter judgment upon her consent to the custody arrangements in Father's original petition and by proceeding with trial, arguing the court lacked jurisdiction. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that a trial court has an independent duty to determine custody in the best interests of the children, even if parties have previously consented, and that the parties were no longer in agreement at the time of trial.