Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Diana J. Thompson, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
diana-j-thompson-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Diana J. Thompson, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Diana J. Thompson, et al. vs. Heirs of Kathryn L. Metcalf, et al.

Appellant

Diana Thompson, the successful bidder at a tax sale, sought to quiet title to real property, but the trial court granted summary judgment to the original owner's siblings, Jerry and Joanne Metcalf, voiding Thompson's collector's deed. The trial court found Thompson failed to notify Joseph Metcalf, the owner by beneficiary deed, of his right to redeem the property. On appeal, the Western District affirmed, holding that Joseph's beneficiary designation constituted a "publicly recorded claim" entitling him to redemption notice, which Thompson failed to provide. The court also concluded that Jerry and Joanne had standing to challenge the deed and that Thompson's claim for reimbursement for improvements was not properly supported in the summary judgment record.