Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Directory of Department of Public Safety Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
directory-of-department-of-public-safety
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Directory of Department of Public Safety

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 15, 2023

Lawrence L. Ciesemier vs. Directory of Department of Public Safety

Respondent

Lawrence Ciesemier, a licensed peace officer, appealed the circuit court's judgment affirming the Director of the Department of Public Safety's order revoking his peace officer license. The Director's decision stemmed from Ciesemier's actions of removing and destroying electronic tracking collars from hunting dogs on his property and subsequently lying to a deputy investigating the incident. Ciesemier argued the discipline was an abuse of discretion due to its severity compared to his conduct and mitigating factors. The appellate court affirmed, finding no abuse of discretion in the Director's decision to revoke the license.