Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Distributor Operations, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
distributor-operations-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Distributor Operations, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 23, 2018

Peggy Crawford, Appellant, v. Distributor Operations, Inc., Respondent.

Respondent

Peggy Crawford sued Distributor Operations, Inc. (DOI) for strict liability, negligence, and breach of lease related to lead pollution on property DOI had leased from her. The trial court granted partial summary judgment for DOI, asserting a statute of limitations defense. The appellate court reversed and remanded, finding a genuine dispute of material fact regarding when the lead pollution damages were capable of ascertainment, which is crucial for determining when the five-year statute of limitations began to run.