Missouri Case Party

Douglas Acol and Nabila Acol Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: douglas-acol-and-nabila-acol
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Civil Litigation

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Corporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Litigation Consultation Call About A Litigation Claim

Cases Involving Douglas Acol and Nabila Acol

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 19, 2021

Douglas Acol and Nabila Acol, Appellants, vs. Travers Autoplex & RV, Inc., Respondent.

Appellant

Douglas and Nabila Acol sued Travers Autoplex & RV, Inc. for inadequate RV repairs, alleging various claims including breach of contract, negligence, and Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) violations. The trial court entered a jury verdict for Travers and awarded attorney's fees. The appellate court affirmed the jury's verdict on the merits, finding no error in the jury instructions regarding implied warranty or the economic loss doctrine. However, the court reversed the award of attorney's fees to Travers, concluding the trial court abused its discretion.

Corporate Law Civil Litigation