St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

DOUGLAS NIEMUTH, and CAROL NIEMUTH, Respondents/Cross- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
douglas-niemuth-and-carol-niemuth-respondents/cross
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Corporate LawCivil LitigationReal Estate

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Corporate ConsultationCall About A Corporate Claim

Cases Involving DOUGLAS NIEMUTH, and CAROL NIEMUTH, Respondents/Cross-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Donald Gaston and Roundcount Ranch, LLC appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Douglas and Carol Niemuth regarding a right-of-first-refusal (ROFR) in a real estate contract. The Niemuths sought to purchase a portion of a 190-acre tract, while Gaston had a bona fide offer for the entire tract. The appellate court reversed, holding that the ROFR required the Niemuths to match the terms of the bona fide offer, including the purchase of the entire tract. The case was remanded with instructions to enter judgment for Gaston and Roundcount and award Gaston attorney's fees.

Corporate LawReal EstateCivil Litigation