Missouri Case Party

DUNKLIN COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: dunklin-county-juvenile-office
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Civil Litigation

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Criminal Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving DUNKLIN COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Feb 26, 2024

In the Interest of: R.S., Appellant vs. DUNKLIN COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Respondent

Respondent

R.S., a seventeen-year-old, appealed the juvenile court's order dismissing his juvenile cause of action and certifying him for prosecution as an adult for alleged offenses including first-degree assault and armed criminal action. R.S. contended the juvenile court abused its discretion by certifying him as an adult. The appellate court affirmed the juvenile court's decision, finding no abuse of discretion after reviewing the totality of the circumstances and the statutory criteria for certification.

Criminal Law Civil Litigation