Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dwight Moore Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dwight-moore
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dwight Moore

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jan 31, 2023

Dwight Moore, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appellant

Dwight Moore appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following his convictions for resisting a lawful stop and first-degree child endangerment. Moore claimed trial counsel was ineffective for failing to include definitions of "knowingly" and "acted with criminal negligence" in jury instructions, and that the motion court erred by not issuing findings on one of these claims. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's denial, finding no clear error and concluding that Moore failed to demonstrate prejudice from counsel's strategic decisions regarding jury instructions, and that a remand for findings was unnecessary.