Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Edgar Foshe Bozarth, Sr. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
edgar-foshe-bozarth-sr
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Edgar Foshe Bozarth, Sr.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 24, 2020

Joyce Elaine Bozarth vs. Edgar Foshe Bozarth, Sr.

Respondent

Ms. Joyce Bozarth appealed the circuit court's amended judgment in a breach-of-contract action against Mr. Edgar Bozarth, Sr., stemming from a 2002 separation agreement. The circuit court had denied Ms. Bozarth's motion for partial summary judgment and, without a cross-motion, ruled in Mr. Bozarth's favor on the merits, also awarding him attorney fees. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the circuit court erred by granting summary judgment to a non-moving party without a proper motion, which violated Rule 74.04. Consequently, the attorney fee award was also vacated.