Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
empire-district-electric-company
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Taneycomo Lakefront Resort and RV Park, LLC, appealed a summary judgment granted to Empire District Electric Company in a boundary dispute. The dispute arose after a new survey placed the "715 line" for Lake Taneycomo much higher than previously believed, affecting property ownership and taxes. The appellate court reversed the summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings, finding it indistinguishable from its recent decision in Predovic, which involved similar facts and claims regarding a § 516.070 adverse possession claim.