Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Eric Branson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
eric-branson
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Eric Branson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 12, 2020

Eric Branson, Respondent, vs. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant.

Respondent

Eric Branson petitioned the circuit court to reinstate his driving privileges after a five-year revocation for driving while intoxicated. The Director of Revenue opposed, arguing Branson was ineligible due to a controlled substance conviction within the preceding five years, as per Section 302.060.1(10). The circuit court granted Branson's petition. The appellate court reversed, holding that Branson's guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance eleven days before filing his petition rendered him ineligible under the plain language of the statute, and the circuit court lacked authority to create exceptions.