Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Eric V. McMillon Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
eric-v-mcmillon
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Eric V. McMillon

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 26, 2022

State of Missouri vs. Eric V. McMillon

Respondent

Eric V. McMillon was convicted by a jury of statutory rape and statutory sodomy. On appeal, McMillon contended that the circuit court erred by changing the venue of his trial from western Jackson County to eastern Jackson County, arguing a lack of statutory authority for such a transfer and a violation of his constitutional rights. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that the presiding judge had the administrative authority to order the trial to be held at the Eastern Jackson County Courthouse, as it was a change of facility, not a statutory transfer of venue, and was supported by constitutional and statutory provisions.