Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Eric William Cooley Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
eric-william-cooley
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Eric William Cooley

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 2, 2024

Missouri State Highway Patrol vs. Eric William Cooley

Respondent

The Missouri State Highway Patrol appealed a circuit court judgment that granted Eric Cooley's request to be removed from the sex offender registry. Cooley had previously been discharged from probation in Wyoming without an adjudication of guilt, but was required to register in Missouri. The appellate court vacated the judgment and remanded the case, holding that the circuit court erroneously applied the law by granting Cooley's request without requiring him to comply with statutory notice and party-naming procedures under Section 589.401.